Weapon licences of ex-MLA Vijay Mishra, two others cancelled in Prayagraj
Prayagraj administration cancels licences after police report
Prayagraj district administration has revoked the arms licences of former MLA Vijay Mishra along with two other licence holders, following police reports that flagged their alleged involvement in criminal activities. The district magistrate acted after reviewing inputs from local police stations and ordered cancellation as part of a wider drive to curb misuse of licensed weapons.
Why the cancellations happened — background on Vijay Mishra
Vijay Mishra is a well-known and controversial political figure in Uttar Pradesh. He has been in custody and faces multiple criminal cases across districts, including serious charges that have resulted in convictions in some matters. Authorities said the scale and nature of these pending criminal proceedings were key reasons for revoking the licence tied to a rifle, and noted earlier cancellations of other licences linked to him and his family.
What the administration cited
Officials pointed to police reports that indicated the licence holders were either currently embroiled in criminal cases or had histories that made continued possession of weapons a risk to public safety. The district magistrate—exercising powers under the Arms Act and related rules—directed that the firearms covered by the cancelled licences be surrendered to the nearest police station or face legal consequences.
Who else was affected
Along with Vijay Mishra, two other licence holders identified by the administration were named locally as Subhash Upadhyay of Nawabganj and Lallu Ram of Khiri. Local reporting said their licences were similarly revoked because of criminal antecedents and ongoing cases in their names. This is part of a pattern of pro-active licence reviews in the district.
What this means legally — arms licences and public safety
When district authorities receive credible police reports suggesting misuse, or when licence-holders are implicated in criminal offences, the licensing authority can suspend or cancel licences under provisions of the Arms Act and administrative rules. Cancellation usually requires the weapon to be surrendered immediately and can lead to seizure and criminal action if the order is ignored. Courts can later review such administrative decisions, but until a court orders otherwise, the cancellation stands.
Impact on ongoing law-and-order drive in Prayagraj
The cancellations come amid a sustained effort by Prayagraj and nearby district administrations to scrutinize arms licences, especially where holders have criminal records or are accused in violent crimes. Officials said this is aimed at reducing the risk of licensed firearms being used in crimes or fueling local conflicts. Similar licence revocations have been carried out in recent months as police compile lists of questionable licence-holders.
How licence-holders can respond
If a licence-holder believes the cancellation is wrongful, the administrative remedy is to challenge the order in the appropriate court or seek review before the licensing authority with supporting documents. In previous cases, courts have sometimes restored licences where it was proven that cancellation lacked proper basis; however, where police reports are strong and cases are pending, getting a licence reinstated is difficult. It’s best to follow legal routes rather than ignore surrender orders.
What readers should watch next
For those tracking the Vijay Mishra story, the immediate next items to watch are: whether he or the other two affected parties file legal challenges, whether the surrendered firearms are formally seized and inventoried, and whether further administrative actions are taken against other licence-holders in Prayagraj. Local courts may also receive petitions challenging the cancellations — those hearings will clarify the legal footing of the administration’s move.
Why this matters beyond one man
This decision is significant not just because of the name involved, but because it underscores a policy shift: licensing authorities are actively re-checking whether weapons are held by people who pose a law-and-order risk. That has implications for community safety, policing priorities, and how politically connected individuals are treated under administrative rules. In short, the message from the administration is clear — licences are privileges that can be revoked if public safety is at stake.
Practical takeaway for citizens
If you legally hold a weapon licence, keep your records updated, comply with all storage and safety rules, and avoid actions that could produce adverse police reports. If you’re concerned about a neighbour or public figure misusing a licensed weapon, report concrete evidence to your local police so authorities can investigate and, if needed, initiate administrative review. These measures help reduce misuse and make communities safer.
Final note
The cancellation of Vijay Mishra’s weapon licence is a current administrative development that reflects both the local law-and-order environment and a willingness by district authorities to act on police intelligence. For verified updates, follow local reporting from Prayagraj district administration notices and court filings as the situation unfolds.
Also Read: Rohit Sharma’s Net Session with Sarfaraz Khan Goes Viral!
