Tanya Mittal Unfazed by Backlash Over Pahalgam Attack Remark: “Very Happy That MP Tourism Left Me”
New Delhi, September 1, 2025 —
Reality TV contestant and social media influencer Tanya Mittal has once again found herself at the center of a storm, this time over her remarks on the Pahalgam terror attack. Despite sharp criticism and two state tourism departments distancing themselves from her, Tanya insists she is unfazed. In fact, she says she is “very happy” about the turn of events, claiming that such setbacks have only made her stronger.
What Sparked the Controversy
The controversy began after the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir, in which 26 people lost their lives. Tanya Mittal, who was seen in Bigg Boss 19, posted a video in its aftermath where she said:
“Terrorism has no religion.”
The statement quickly went viral and divided social media users. While some supported her call for unity and peace, others criticized it as insensitive, especially in the immediate aftermath of the attack.
As the outrage grew, rumors spread that Tanya Mittal was associated with the Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh tourism departments as a brand ambassador. This triggered further backlash, with many questioning why government departments were linked with someone making such statements.
Both state tourism departments swiftly issued clarifications, denying any official association with Tanya Mittal. They also emphasized that they had “nothing to do” with her remarks.
Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh Tourism Step Away
According to statements reported by The Indian Express and Livemint, both MP and UP tourism departments categorically distanced themselves from Tanya Mittal. Officials clarified that no formal MoU, contract, or ambassadorial role was ever given to her.
The quick denials were seen by many as damage control, especially given the sensitive nature of the attack. But for Tanya, it was an opportunity to make her stand clearer.
Tanya Mittal’s Defiant Response
Speaking to Hindustan Times, Tanya Mittal expressed not regret, but relief. She said she was completely unfazed by the wave of criticism.
“After the controversy began, within 48 hours I was back to traveling and creating videos. Honestly, it didn’t affect me at all. I know my truth.”
On the backlash and the departments disassociating themselves from her, Tanya added:
“If you have to prove your goodness, then evil wins that day. Just be a good human being and walk away from places that don’t value that.”
She further said that the tourism departments’ move actually helped her realize who really supports her in difficult times:
“I’m very happy that they left me, because now we are associating with other states. So can anyone really stop me?”
A Clash Between Influencer Culture and Public Sentiment
The Tanya Mittal episode highlights the delicate balance between influencer culture and public sentiment. In today’s hyper-connected world, a single statement can ignite massive debates, and influencers often face the brunt of public outrage.
On one hand, Tanya’s supporters argue that her statement was a universal truth—that terrorism indeed transcends religion. On the other hand, critics argue that the timing and context were inappropriate, especially when emotions were running high after the Pahalgam tragedy.
Tourism departments cutting ties with her—or rather, denying any ties—also reflects how quickly government organizations seek to shield themselves from social media controversies.
Tanya Mittal Beyond the Controversy
Despite the uproar, Tanya Mittal continues to enjoy a strong presence on social media, where she regularly shares travel vlogs, lifestyle content, and personal reflections. Her stint in Bigg Boss 19 further amplified her visibility, making her one of the most talked-about personalities of the season.
Interestingly, Tanya herself admits that controversies have become a part of her public journey. Rather than shying away, she seems to embrace them as stepping stones:
“People will always say things. But if I let that affect me, I wouldn’t be where I am today.”
Lessons From the Episode
- The Power of Words
Tanya’s case shows how a single phrase—“terrorism has no religion”—can spark polarized reactions, depending on the audience and the timing. - Influencers as Public Figures
Social media influencers are no longer just content creators; they are public figures who often get held accountable like celebrities or politicians. - Government Partnerships and Image
Departments rushing to clarify their non-association highlights how reputation management has become crucial in the digital age. - Resilience in the Face of Criticism
Tanya’s defiance shows a new generation of influencers may not bow down easily to online outrage.
Conclusion
The Tanya Mittal controversy is more than just a celebrity soundbite gone wrong—it is a reflection of the evolving relationship between influencers, governments, and the public. While her remark on the Pahalgam terror attack divided opinion, her unapologetic stance has also won her admirers who value resilience over retreat.
As she puts it, being left by MP Tourism was not a loss, but liberation. Whether one agrees with her or not, Tanya Mittal has once again proven that in the age of social media, silence is never an option, and defiance often makes louder headlines than apology.
Also Read: Bal Sant Abhinav Arora’s Luxury Ride Breaks the Internet!
