But media really wants it: Divya Khossla on divorce rumours with T-Series’s Bhushan Kumar
Divya Khossla — actress, director and public figure — recently confronted a story that’s become familiar in Bollywood: persistent divorce rumours. In a candid fan Q&A, she addressed speculation about her marriage to T-Series head Bhushan Kumar and pushed back against the gossip. This article unpacks what she said, where the rumours came from, and what it reveals about celebrity life in the age of social media.
Divya Khossla breaks the silence — the short version
When asked directly about reports of a separation from Bhushan Kumar, Divya Khossla denied the rumours. Her tone was firm but wry: she told fans there was no split — adding, pointedly, that “the media really wants it.” That line crystallised her frustration with tabloid churn and the appetite for relationship drama.
What Divya Khossla actually said (and where)
“No — but the media really wants it”
During a recent AMA-style session, Divya addressed multiple personal questions. On the divorce rumours, she gave a clear denial while acknowledging that speculation won’t die easily. Her short, memorable line about the media underscored how much attention these stories attract, regardless of facts.
On Bollywood and integrity
Beyond marital speculation, Divya used the opportunity to comment on the industry. She described Bollywood as being “full of crocodiles” — a blunt metaphor for the cutthroat pressures and compromises celebrities often face. She also said she won’t “sell her soul” for work, signalling a refusal to capitulate to unethical demands or sensational publicity stunts. These remarks show she’s concerned about how industry dynamics feed both career choices and tabloid narratives.
Why the rumours started in the first place
Social media name change and unfollows
The most concrete sparks for the split stories were actions on social media earlier this year. Divya briefly removed “Kumar” from her public profile name and unfollowed certain accounts — behaviour that online sleuths read as a sign of marital trouble. Small profile changes often trigger big conversation, especially for high-profile couples.
Past context and confirmation bias
Once a narrative (like “they are separating”) takes root, confirmation bias and celebrity-obsessed social feeds keep it alive. Old articles about career tensions after marriage or shifts in professional focus were resurfaced and repackaged as evidence, even if unrelated. The combination of selective screenshots, timing, and eager gossip columns created a feedback loop that amplified the story.
Bhushan Kumar’s side — clarifications and explanations
When the name-drop and unfollowing triggered talk, Bhushan Kumar reportedly offered an explanation: some of the social-media adjustments were for astrological reasons and not an indication of separation. Public clarifications like this are common when private choices become public fodder, and they help counteract speculation — though rarely immediately.
A quick background on Divya Khossla and the union
Divya Khosla (often credited as Divya Khossla Kumar) and Bhushan Kumar have been a visible couple in the Hindi film world for years. Divya’s career has spanned acting, singing and directing; Bhushan leads T-Series, one of India’s largest music and film companies. Their marriage, family life and professional overlaps make them natural subjects of media attention — which, in turn, fuels rumours whenever something changes publicly.
How public figures can limit rumor damage — lessons from this episode
- Be proactive with facts: A short, direct response (as Divya offered) is often the best antidote to conjecture. Silence can be misread; clarity rarely is.
- Control the narrative on your terms: If social media changes risk being misinterpreted, a brief explanation saves time and reduces speculation. Bhushan’s astrological explanation is an example.
- Set boundaries around private life: Celebrities increasingly emphasise that not every personal detail needs public dissection. Divya’s refusal to perform for gossip is a clear boundary-setting move.
Why the public cares — and why that matters
Celebrity relationships function as public narratives that people follow for entertainment, identification, or judgment. When audiences read between the lines of social media, they’re often projecting desires or anxieties onto real people. That curiosity has commercial value for outlets, which is why certain stories keep getting “pushed” — and why figures like Divya must repeatedly correct the record. Understanding that commercial incentive helps explain why rumours persist even after denials.
Final takeaways: what this means for Divya Khossla and readers
Divya Khossla handled the rumours with a mix of denial, dry humour and a critique of the industry that turns private lives into content. Her response wasn’t just about the marital claim; it was a stand against a media ecosystem that profits from sensationalism.
For readers, the episode is a reminder to treat online gossip with healthy skepticism. Small actions — a name change, an unfollow, a late-night post — do not automatically signal an earthquake in a person’s life. And for public figures, clear communication remains the fastest path to quelling baseless stories.
Also Read: Katy Perry Hard‑Launches Justin Trudeau on Instagram!
