Akshay Kumar Refused to Return Fee After I Lost ₹85 Crore in Film: Maker – What Really Happened?
Bollywood superstar Akshay Kumar is once again in the spotlight, but this time not just for his films or box‑office presence. A prominent film producer has recently made some bold claims about a past project the two collaborated on — alleging that Akshay refused to refund part of his fee after the film suffered huge losses. Let’s unpack the full story, what has been said, and why it’s generating industry buzz.
Background: Who Is Akshay Kumar?
Akshay Kumar is one of the most well‑known and bankable actors in Indian cinema. With a career spanning more than three decades, he’s known for his versatility — performing in action films, comedies, dramas, and socially relevant cinema. Over the years, he has also become one of the highest‑paid stars in Bollywood. His films have ranged from massive commercial hits to some that failed to connect with audiences.
The Controversial Film: 8 × 10 Tasveer
The controversy centers on the 2009 film 8 × 10 Tasveer, an action thriller directed by Nagesh Kukunoor and starring Akshay Kumar. The premise followed a man who could see into the past through photographs and set out to uncover the truth behind his father’s mysterious death.
According to producer Shailendra Singh, the film’s budget ballooned during production due to scheduling challenges and location changes. What was originally planned as a modestly budgeted feature became costly — reportedly leading to losses upwards of ₹85 crore at the box office after the film bombed.
What the Producer Claims: Fee & Refund Dispute
In a recent interview with Siddharth Kannan, Shailendra Singh alleged that:
- Akshay Kumar was paid a significant fee for his role in 8 × 10 Tasveer.
- After the film’s poor performance, Singh requested that Akshay return part of his remuneration to help cover losses.
- According to Singh, Akshay refused to refund or adjust any portion of his fee.
- Singh claims this experience was so impactful that he eventually stopped producing films.
Singh also described his past professional relationship with Akshay as friendly, noting they used to play sports together, and stated that his comments weren’t made out of bitterness but from a hard‑earned lesson.
“Businessman First, Actor Later”
One of the most talked‑about parts of Singh’s remarks is his characterization of Akshay as someone who is “a businessman first, then an actor.” According to the producer:
- Akshay allegedly negotiates his fees very strategically.
- Singh illustrated this by suggesting the actor may start with a lower offer during negotiations, then steadily increase his demand — at times reaching figures influenced by his “lucky number 9” (e.g., going from ₹15 crore to ₹36 crore).
- Singh believes this reflects a calculated business mindset rather than purely an artistic approach to acting.
This description doesn’t suggest personal animosity, but rather highlights the producer’s perspective on how star remuneration is handled in big‑budget Bollywood projects.
Industry Context: How Actor Fees Normally Work
It’s important to understand how fees typically function in the film world:
- Actors usually sign contracts before shooting, which lock in their fees.
- These payments aren’t usually tied to box‑office performance unless there’s a profit‑sharing deal or bonus clause — and such clauses must be negotiated and written into contracts.
- Refunding fees after a film flops is not common industry practice unless pre‑agreeed terms are violated.
In Akshay Kumar’s case, there has been no public confirmation from him or his representatives regarding Singh’s accusations so far. That means this account remains an unverified claim from one side.
Why This Matters
The controversy has gained attention not just because it involves a major star, but because it touches on ongoing debates in Bollywood about:
1. Star Power and Producer Risks
Big stars can command high fees, but producers often carry most of the financial risk. When a film fails, producers, financiers, and crew can suffer losses even if actors are paid upfront.
2. Profit‑Sharing vs. Fixed Fees
Some filmmakers believe that top actors should be more willing to share financial downside risk, especially when a project fails — for example, through profit‑sharing.
3. Industry Relationships
High‑profile disputes can influence future collaborations, contracts, and negotiations in Bollywood, especially if more producers speak up.
What Akshay Kumar Has Said (Or Not Said)
As of now, Akshay Kumar or his spokesperson has not publicly responded to these specific claims regarding 8 × 10 Tasveer and the fee refund dispute. This means the statements remain unverified allegations from the producer’s perspective.
Final Thoughts
While the headlines might seem dramatic, it’s essential to separate verified facts from personal accounts. Here’s what we do know based on credible reporting:
- 8 × 10 Tasveer was a box‑office failure.
- Producer Shailendra Singh claims to have lost significant money on the project.
- Singh asserts that Akshay Kumar refused to refund or adjust his fee after the flop.
- These allegations remain unconfirmed by Akshay himself or his team.
This episode has sparked broader conversation about actor remuneration, financial risk in filmmaking, and the balance between business and creativity in Bollywood. Whether it leads to changes in how contracts are structured remains to be seen — but it’s certainly a story the industry is watching closely.
Also Read: Ram Charan-Upasana Expecting Twins Jan 31! – Logic Matters
