Randeep Hooda praises Ranveer Singh’s Dhurandhar, slams witch-hunt around film: ‘Absolutely blown away’

Randeep Hooda’s recent public endorsement of Dhurandhar has added a notable voice to the growing conversation around the Ranveer Singh starrer. The actor — known for speaking his mind on cinema and politics — not only lauded the film’s craft but also criticized the backlash he calls a “witch-hunt.” Below we break down what Hooda said, why his reaction matters, and how the debate around Dhurandhar is shaping up.

Why Randeep Hooda’s praise matters

Randeep Hooda isn’t just another celebrity offering a thumbs-up. He’s an established performer whose viewpoints often spark broader industry discussion. When Hooda said he was “absolutely blown away” by Dhurandhar, he singled out direction, writing and background score as strengths — comments he shared publicly on social platforms.

His endorsement arrives while the film is riding strong box-office numbers and intense public scrutiny. That combination — praise from peers plus commercial success — makes Hooda’s take noteworthy for both audiences and critics.

Randeep Hooda on the film: craft first, controversy second

Hooda’s comments focused first on craft. He praised the film’s tight direction, the pull of Ranveer Singh’s performance, and the effective use of score and writing that keep the spy-thriller taut and engaging. Those remarks reflect the view shared by many in the industry who’ve watched the film and appreciated its cinematic elements.

Importantly, Hooda also pushed back against what he described as unfair attacks targeting the film’s alleged politics. He likened the negative campaign to a “witch-hunt,” asking viewers and commentators to separate artistic merit from politically charged headlines. His call was for measured critique, not knee-jerk dismissal.

What Hooda compared Dhurandhar to

In his remarks, Randeep Hooda drew a parallel between the public scrutiny of Dhurandhar and reactions to other films he’s been connected with thematically. That comparison was meant to highlight how cinema that engages with patriotic or historical themes often becomes a lightning rod for debate. The point: strong storytelling should be judged on quality and context, not dismissed because its narrative touches sensitive topics.

The controversy: what critics are saying, and how the film’s team responded

Dhurandhar has faced a two-pronged public response: strong box-office performance and vocal criticism from a subset of commentators who label the film “propaganda.” Those debates intensified after a few high-profile reactions online and in the media.

Members of the film team have responded. Casting director Mukesh Chhabra publicly rejected claims that the film promotes propaganda, urging audiences to watch and judge for themselves. Actors and technicians affiliated with the project have echoed that stance: the film, they say, is a work of fiction inspired by real events and intended primarily as entertainment.

A recent apology and the sensitivity around cultural moments

Separately, the film’s promotions saw an incident in which Ranveer Singh issued an apology for mimicking a tribute perceived as insensitive by some viewers. The actor clarified his intent and expressed regret for any offense caused, underscoring how promotional moments can inflame cultural sensitivities even before audiences fully engage with a movie. That episode added fuel to the controversy and likely influenced how some commentators approached the film.

Box office and public reception — the numbers and the buzz

Despite mixed commentary, Dhurandhar performed strongly where it matters to filmmakers: at the ticket window and in social conversations. Early box-office reports showed impressive daily collections and wide release across thousands of screens. Audience reactions on social media and cinema feeds leaned positive overall, with many viewers applauding Ranveer Singh’s return to a high-octane action role.

That commercial success gives weight to Randeep Hooda’s argument: if the film connects with audiences and demonstrates craft, outright dismissal may be premature.

What Randeep Hooda’s stance means for Bollywood discourse

When established actors like Randeep Hooda publicly defend a film, it nudges the conversation toward nuance. His intervention highlights several useful points for the industry and viewers:

• Artistic merit and political interpretation are not the same thing. Films can be both well-made and subject to political readings; each claim should be evaluated separately.
• Social media outrage can escalate quickly; thoughtful, informed critique is more valuable than instant judgment.
• Film teams and audiences both bear responsibility: creators should be mindful of cultural contexts; critics should watch the full work before forming wholesale conclusions.

Hooda’s measured call for fairness adds a voice urging restraint and clarity in a debate that’s otherwise loud and polarized.

Final take: Randeep Hooda’s message for viewers

At its core, Randeep Hooda’s response is simple: watch the film, assess the craft, and then form a view. He celebrates Dhurandhar’s technical strengths and performances while condemning what he sees as disproportionate, politically driven attacks.

For readers deciding whether to watch the film, Hooda’s recommendation — grounded in admiration for the movie’s execution — suggests that Dhurandhar deserves attention as a piece of cinema first. If you’re curious about the debates, watch for yourself and judge with both eyes open: to narrative, to context, and to craft.

Also Read: Haarsh Limbachiyaa’s 3rd Baby Joke Leaves Sonali Shocked! – Logic Matters